Regulatory Effectiveness: Stakeholder Perceptions of Namibia’s Communications Regulatory Framework

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shanapinda, Stanley
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-05T13:29:49Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-05T13:29:49Z
dc.date.issued 2015-12-15
dc.identifier.citation Shanapinda, S. (2015). Regulatory effectiveness: Stakeholder perceptions of Namibia’s communications regulatory framework. The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC), 14, 8-19. http://doi.org/10.23962/10539/20343
dc.identifier.issn ISSN 2077-7213 (online version)
dc.identifier.issn ISSN 2077-7205 (print version)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10539/20343
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.23962/10539/20343
dc.description.abstract Communications regulatory frameworks are established to achieve myriad regulatory objectives. These may include affordable pricing, consumer welfare and competition. A regulatory framework is therefore endowed with regulatory governance measures and regulatory incentives to enable it to achieve these purposes. In applying these measures and incentives, the framework becomes effective, or ineffective, depending on whether the regulatory purpose is met. The purpose of this qualitative exploratory study was to assess the perceptions of the stakeholders, as active participants in the evolution of the framework, regarding the effectiveness of the types of measures and incentives implemented within the Namibian institutional context. Perception studies can be valuable because they offer insight on how the policies, laws and regulations that are implemented are viewed by the stakeholders for whom they are designed and implemented. While these are not the only inputs, knowledge of stakeholder views informs the future redesign of these measures and incentives to make the regulatory framework increasingly more effective. One of the main findings of the research was that the perceived conflict of interests between the ICT policy role of the Ministry of ICT and its shareholder role over Telecom Namibia negatively impacts competition. Its policy support for the dominant role of Telecom Namibia is in conflict with the regulatory purpose of encouraging private investment. The conclusion was that this regulatory governance design measure conflicts with the regulatory framework and requires legislative amendment and a re-design of the framework in an effort to improve competitiveness in Namibia’s electronic communications market.
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher LINK Centre, University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), Johannesburg en_ZA
dc.subject communications regulatory framework, regulatory effectiveness, institutional endowment, regulatory governance, regulatory incentives, regulatory purpose, competitiveness, regulatory independence, perception studies, Namibia
dc.title Regulatory Effectiveness: Stakeholder Perceptions of Namibia’s Communications Regulatory Framework en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA
dc.citation.doi http://doi.org/10.23962/10539/20343


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • AJIC Issue 14, 2015
    Thematic Issue: Economic Regulation and Regulatory Performance in the Electronic Communications Sector

Show simple item record

Search WIReDSpace


Browse

My Account