Kimberley's closed compounds: a model for Southern African compounds

Show simple item record Turrell, Rob 2011-05-26T06:54:26Z 2011-05-26T06:54:26Z 1982-09-13
dc.description African Studies Seminar series. Paper presented 13 September, 1982 en_US
dc.description.abstract While it is by now conventional wisdom that the compound 'provided the framework for the total exploitation of ... black workers', (1) it has often been assumed by historians that the late nineteenth century closed compounds at Kimberley provided a superior material and social environment to their imitators on the Rand and in Southern Rhodesia (2). This assumption has been based on diamond mine owners' claims to have created an attractive social microcosm in their compounds, in which African workers were forced to spend their non-working lives for the duration of a contract. Moreover, the mine owners argued that it was these model social welfare compounds that compensated for a worker's loss of freedom. And it was a measure of the validity of their claim, they continued, that the mines never went short of labour and thus did not need to resort to labour recruitment, (3). This view of model diamond compounds in the 1880s and 1890s is a mine owner's myth. In the areas of accommodation, diet and health care, early Kimberley compounds were not markedly superior to the standards found in early Rand and Southern Rhodesian compounds. Van Onselen has compared conditions in these latter two mining regions and shown that, of the two, Rhodesian compounds were worse. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries African Studies Institute;ISS 430
dc.subject Miners. South Africa. Kimberley en_US
dc.subject Migrant labor. Housing. South Africa en_US
dc.subject Miners. Housing. South Africa en_US
dc.title Kimberley's closed compounds: a model for Southern African compounds en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search WIReDSpace


My Account